<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Zoom on Sovereign Shift</title>
    <link>https://sovereignshift.eu/tags/zoom/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Zoom on Sovereign Shift</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://sovereignshift.eu/tags/zoom/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Why Replacing Zoom Is Easy but Replacing Google Workspace Is Not</title>
      <link>https://sovereignshift.eu/blog/why-replacing-zoom-easy-google-workspace-not/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://sovereignshift.eu/blog/why-replacing-zoom-easy-google-workspace-not/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;When European organisations start thinking about reducing their US cloud dependency, the first instinct is to rank their tools by risk and start replacing them. This instinct is correct. The mistake is assuming that every replacement is roughly the same amount of work.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;It is not. Replacing Zoom takes an afternoon. Replacing Google Workspace takes months. The difference is not about the quality of alternatives. Good alternatives exist for both. The difference is structural: it comes down to how deeply the tool has embedded itself into the way your organisation operates.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
